vibestats/Guides/How to compare model usage

Guide

How to compare model usage

A practical guide to comparing AI model usage in vibestats across reporting windows and source scopes.

Intent
Guide
Focus
How to compare model usage is a practical workflow page for turning local AI coding usage into something readable and repeatable.

Highlights

  • Stable windows matter more than perfect totals
  • Model share is easier to read when grouped directly
  • Source context helps interpret model shifts

Relevant commands

npx vibestats --modelnpx vibestats --since 2026-01-01 --until 2026-01-31 --modelnpx vibestats all --model

Step 1

Switch to model grouping

Use the model report shape so the output groups by model instead of by day or month.

Step 2

Keep the date window stable

Use a clear date range so the comparison reflects model behavior and not a moving reporting window.

Step 3

Add cost and source context

Check whether model share also changes cost shape or differs between Claude-compatible and Codex usage.

Why this guide exists

Most AI coding reporting problems are not about one missing command. They are about choosing the right surface: daily usage, wrapped summaries, activity heatmaps, cost views, or shareable aggregate pages.

What to expect

This guide stays focused on vibestats workflows and the pages already documented in the public command reference, so you can move from local data to a readable result quickly.

FAQ

What is the fastest way to approach how to compare model usage?

Start with the relevant command, verify the output locally, then decide whether you need a share page, a wrapped summary, or a heatmap for communication.

Do I need to upload raw conversations for these guides?

No. vibestats works from local usage artifacts and only turns aggregate results into hosted pages when you explicitly publish them.

Related pages

Continue by intent

View all guides